Queensway House, 57 Livery Street, Birmingham B3 1HA
BIR/00CN/LDC/2019/0005 · dispensation from consultation · Birmingham · decided 1 Nov 2019
The tribunal granted the management company dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for installing gates and railings at the front of the building, because the work was not urgent but the leaseholders had been proactive and none of them objected.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Queensway House (Birmingham) Ltd |
| Management company | Queensway House (Birmingham) Ltd |
| Managing agent | Scanlans Property Management LLP |
| Building | A block, 6 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The property at [name] House comprises of six self-contained flats
- management company
Applicant : [name] House (Birmingham) Ltd
- agent
Applicant’s Representative : Scanlans Property Management LLP
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the dispensation requested under section 20ZA and determines accordingly.
- s20
The Tribunal grants the dispensation requested under section 20ZA and determines accordingly.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.