Queensridge Court, 82 Queensway, Oldbury, B68 0LE
BIR/00CS/LDC/2022/0026 · dispensation from consultation · Sandwell · decided 2 Jan 2022
The Tribunal granted the landlord Housing 21 dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for the urgent replacement of the heating and hot water system at Queensridge Court, as the tribunal found no prejudice to leaseholders.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 60 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £143,578.87 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
the existing system served 60 flats for communal heating/hot water
- outcome
The requested dispensation is, therefore, granted.
- total demanded
the total cost was £143,578.87 including VAT
- s20
the Tribunal determines that, on the evidence provided, it is reasonable to dispense with the consultation requirements of section 20 of the Act.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.