Queensland Place, 2 Chatham Place, Liverpool, L7 3AA
MAN/00BY/LRM/2023/0006 · right to manage · Liverpool · decided 25 Apr 2025
The tribunal decided that the existing RTM company claimed by the second respondent did not validly exist for the Property, so the applicant RTM company was entitled to acquire the right to manage the building on 5th May 2023.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Schloss Roxburghe Holdings Ltd |
| Management company | Chatham Place Liverpool RTM Company Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | insurance, legal and professional fees, administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | legal and professional fees, administration charges |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
The original Respondent to both applications was Schloss Roxburghe Holdings Limited, which is the current freehold owner of the Property.
- outcome
Pursuant to Section 84(3) of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002, [name] Place RTM Co Ltd was on the relevant date entitled to acquire the right to manage the Property
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.