Properties at Chestnut Grange and others, Burton-upon-Trent, DE14 3HL
BIR/41UC/LDC/2023/0005 · dispensation from consultation · East Staffordshire · decided 26 Jun 2023
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements to enter a fixed-term electricity supply contract for the common areas across the portfolio of flats, without deciding whether any charges are payable or reasonable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Trent & Dove Housing Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | An estate |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : Trent & Dove Housing Limited (Landlord)
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of entering into a fixed energy contract
- s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of entering into a fixed energy contract
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.