Princess Park Manor, Royal Drive, London N11 3FL
LON/00AC/LSC/2022/0263 · service charges · Barnet · decided 1 Nov 2023
The tribunal decided that building insurance should be apportioned equally between all flats, that the insurance premiums were reasonable, that leaseholders' contributions to window refurbishment are limited to £250 each because of a consultation failure, that the management fee is reduced to £250 + VAT per unit, that book-keeping charges are disallowed, and that Megadene door entry charges are reduced to £50 per unit per year.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 277 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020, 2021, 2022 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, insurance, major works, management fees, other, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges, management fees, other, utilities |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising 277 flats, with an additional 83 flats in a new building
- freeholder
Applicant : Brookstream Properties Limited
- years
all in respect of the 2020/21, 2021/22 and 2022/23 service charge years
- outcome
The management fee is reduced to £250 + VAT per unit for each of the service charge years 2020/21, 2021/22 and 2022/23.
- items reduced
The book-keeping charges are disallowed in their entirety for each of the service charge years 2020/21, 2021/22 and 2022/23.
- s20
the Applicant failed to carry out a section 20 consultation process in relation to the window refurbishment
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.