Princes Court, 78-94 (even) Brompton Road, London, SW3 1ES
LON/00BK/LDC/2019/0075 · dispensation from consultation · Westminster · decided 9 Aug 2019
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for additional major works at Princes Court without conditions, refused a section 20C order, and ordered leaseholders to reimburse the £300 application fee through the service charge.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Sandrove, Brahams & Associates Ltd |
| Building | A block, 90 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondents to pay the applicant £300 tribunal fees, to be charged to the service charge |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
90 residential flats on the second to ninth floors
- freeholder
Novel Property Investments Ltd are the freehold owners
- agent
Since 2013, the building has been managed by Sandrove, Brahams & Associates Ltd
- outcome
The Tribunal grants this application to dispense with the consultation requirements imposed by section 20
- s20c
The Tribunal does not make an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in favour of the Respondents.
- s20
The Tribunal grants this application to dispense with the consultation requirements imposed by section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 without conditions.
- costs
the Respondents shall pay the Applicant £300 in respect of the reimbursement of the tribunal fees paid by the Applicant.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.