Port East Apartments, 14 Hertsmere Road, London E14 4AF
LON/00BG/LDC/2024/0005 · dispensation from consultation · Tower Hamlets · decided 9 Jul 2024
The tribunal granted the landlord unconditional dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent replacement of fire panels and smoke heads at the Port East Apartments block.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | West India Quay (Freehold) Limited |
| Management company | Apartments (Management) Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 76 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Property comprises a Grade 1 listed conversion consisting of 4 blocks with 76 flats and 12 commercial units.
- freeholder
The landlord is stated in the application to be West India Quay (Freehold) Limited
- outcome
The tribunal dispenses unconditionally with the consultation requirements in respect of the qualifying works which are the subject of this application.
- s20
The tribunal dispenses unconditionally with the consultation requirements in respect of the qualifying works which are the subject of this application.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.