Pine Mansions, Vale Road, Bournemouth, Dorset, BH1 3TD
HAV/00HQ/LDC/2025/0761 · dispensation from consultation · Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole · decided 16 Apr 2026
The tribunal granted the landlord unconditional dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for the lift refurbishment and associated works at Pine Mansions, finding the leaseholders suffered no relevant prejudice.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Freehold Management (Traders) Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Together Property Management |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Freehold Management (Traders)
- agent
Representative : Together Property Management
- outcome
The Applicant is granted unconditional dispensation under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
granted unconditional dispensation under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 from the consultation requirements
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.