Phase 2, King Edwards Wharf, Sheepcote Street, Birmigham, B16 8AT
BIR/00CN/LIS/2020/0059 · LIS · Birmingham · decided 6 Feb 2020
The tribunal dispensed with consultation for the Core 13A works and approved the proposed costs of £83,057.26 for those works and £33,838.80 for additional Core 14 works, but refused the £12,000 contingency.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | May 2019 (1) Wallace Estates Limited |
| Management company | Kew Phase Two RTM Company Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 126 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | £128,896.06 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
Phase 2 has 126 apartments and is accessed from Browning Street.
- management company
Applicants : Kew Phase Two RTM Company
- outcome
we do not allow the application in respect of this sum, for the following reasons:
- items reduced
we do not allow the application in respect of this sum, for the following reasons:
- total demanded
the sum for which the Applicant seeks the Tribunal’s sanction is £128,896.06.
- s20
We agree that the consultation requirements for the Core 13A works should be dispensed with, and so we grant the application under section 20ZA in relation to those works.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.