Peterborough Mansions, 69 New Kings Road, London SW6 4SF
LON/00AN/LCP/2021/0004 · LCP · Hammersmith and Fulham · decided 27 Oct 2021
The tribunal decided that the RTM company must pay the freeholder £2,931.60 in reasonable costs for acquiring the right to manage, rejecting the company's claim that £899.40 was enough.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Oakfern Properties Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | £2,931.60 |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant to pay the respondent £2,931.60 as reasonable costs of the right to manage acquisition |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : Oakfern Properties Limited
- outcome
The tribunal finds that the reasonable costs payable by the applicant RTM Company to the respondent is £2,931.60.
- total payable
The tribunal finds that the reasonable costs payable by the applicant RTM Company to the respondent is £2,931.60.
- costs
the reasonable costs payable by the applicant RTM Company to the respondent is £2,931.60
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.