Penrose House, 16 Newsholme Drive, London N21 1TW
LON/00AK/LDC/2023/0251 · dispensation from consultation · Enfield · decided 13 Feb 2024
The tribunal granted retrospective dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent scaffolding and roof repair works carried out after a fire at Penrose House, while noting the leaseholders' right to challenge costs, payability and standard of work later.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Penrose House (Freehold) Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 41 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | insurance, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
containing 41 self-contained flats
- freeholder
Applicant Penrose House (Freehold) Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that retrospective dispensation should be given from the consultation requirements
- s20
retrospective dispensation should be given from the consultation requirements in respect of the specific scaffolding and repair works
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.