Penn House, Jennery Lane, Burnham, SL1 8BN
CAM/00MX/LDC/2025/0705 · dispensation from consultation · Buckinghamshire · decided 17 Mar 2026
The tribunal granted the landlord retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent balcony leak repair works at Penn House, on terms, while stating that it was not deciding whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Trinity Land & Investments Ltd. |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 42 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | applicant to bear its own costs of the application |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Property is 42No. purpose built, 1980’s flats over 3 levels.
- freeholder
Applicant : Trinity Land & Investments Ltd.
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the requirements on the applicant
- s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the requirements on the applicant
- costs
The applicant will meet all of its costs arising from the making and determination of this application.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.