Pembroke Manor, Whitebeam House, Carter Court, Hook, Hampshire RG27 9GH
HAV/24UG/LDC/2025/0686 · dispensation from consultation · Hart · decided 21 Nov 2025
The tribunal granted HML PM Ltd dispensation from the Section 20 consultation requirements for emergency lighting replacement works at Whitebeam House, but made no decision on whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | HML PM Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | HML PM Ltd |
| Building | A block, 9 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
Whitebeam House containing 9 flats.
- freeholder
‘HML PM Ltd’ acts as both the management company
- agent
‘HML PM Ltd’ acts as both the management company and the managing agent for the subject property
- outcome
The Applicant is granted dispensation under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 from the consultation requirements imposed on the landlord by Section 20 of the 1985 Act
- s20
The Applicant is granted dispensation under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 from the consultation requirements
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.