Pavilion Court, Stimpson Avenue, Northampton NN1 4ND
CAM/34UF/LSC/2019/0047 · service charges · West Northamptonshire · decided 16 Dec 2019
The tribunal found insurance payable for 2018/19 at £5,172.69 and for 2019/20 at £3,881.33, after a 35% commission deduction, held the £30 late payment fee not payable, and made a section 20C order protecting lessees from the landlord's tribunal costs.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | The Overs Management Company |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 42 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2018, 2019 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, insurance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges, insurance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | £5,172.69 |
| Fees or costs ordered | fees of £30 to be reimbursed by a party |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a modern development of 42 long residential leases granted between 2007 and 2008
- management company
The Overs Management Company
- years
the insurance premium claimed for 2018/19 and 2019/20
- outcome
the premium for each year (excluding tax) should be reduced by 35%
- items reduced
the premium for each year (excluding tax) should be reduced by 35%
- s20c
makes an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.