Pavilion Apartments and Car Parking Space, 34 St Johns Wood Road London NW8 7HB
LON/00BK/LDC/2023/0020 · dispensation from consultation · Westminster · decided 17 Apr 2023
The tribunal refused the landlord's application for dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for electrical works to the car park, so the application was dismissed.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation refused |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | The Pavilions Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 120 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Property is stated in the application to be a 120 unit purpose built
- management company
This is an application under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (the Act) by the management company, The Pavilions Limited
- outcome
therefore the Applicant’s application is dismissed
- s20
it is not reasonable that dispensation should be granted from the remaining consultation provisions as required under s20 of the Act
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.