Pan Peninsula, 1-2 Pan Peninsula Square, London E14 9SL
LON/00BG/LDC/2025/0664 · dispensation from consultation · Tower Hamlets · decided 20 Aug 2025
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for refurbishing heat exchangers and associated works, and limited the landlord's costs of the application that may be added to the service charge to those of the oral hearing.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 765 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
containing a total of 765 residential units on both private
- freeholder
(1) Ballymore Millharbour Limited
- outcome
The tribunal grants the applicants dispensation from consultation
- s20c
The tribunal makes an order under s.20c of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 so that only the costs of and incidental to the oral hearing may be added to the service charges.
- s20
The tribunal grants the applicants dispensation from consultation
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.