Ontario Tower, New Providence Wharf, London E14 9PQ
LON/00BG/LDC/2023/0192 · dispensation from consultation · Tower Hamlets · decided 6 Dec 2023
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for the extra cost of the new automatic opening vent system, on conditions, and the landlord may not recover its application costs through the service charge.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 295 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £97,023 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant to pay the respondents' reasonable costs of this application |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising 295 apartments
- freeholder
the freehold of the Building is owned by Edwardian Canary Wharf Hotel Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from all of the consultation requirements under S.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- total demanded
Dispensation is being sought therefore for the overspend of £97,023 inclusive of VAT.
- s20c
The applicants may not recover their costs of this application via the service charge account
- s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from all of the consultation requirements under S.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- costs
The applicant must also pay any reasonable costs incurred by the respondents in relation to this application.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.