Olivers Wharf, 64 Wapping High Street, London E1W 2PJ - Costs
LON/00BG/LDC/2019/0214 · dispensation from consultation · Tower Hamlets · decided 24 Aug 2020
The tribunal dismissed the respondent's application for costs under rule 13 because it found the applicant had not acted unreasonably in relation to the earlier dispensation application for fire prevention works.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused (from the later costs ruling on this case, linked below) |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Olivers Wharf (Management) Limited |
| Management company | Olivers Wharf (Management) Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 23 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020 |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
there are in total 23
- management company
Applicant : [name] Wharf (Management) Limited
- outcome
the application under the provisions of rule 13 Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal)(Property Chamber) Rules 2013 (the Rule) is dismissed
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
Later rulings on the same case (costs, section 20C, permission to appeal): 14 Feb 2020.
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.