Old Bank House, Corporation St. High Wycombe, Bucks HP13 6TQ
CAM/00MX/LDC/2025/0694 · dispensation from consultation · Buckinghamshire · decided 2 Feb 2026
The tribunal refused the landlord's application for dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for replacing one top floor stairwell window, so consultation is required before that work is charged to leaseholders.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation refused |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Alba Management Services |
| Building | A block, 8 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant to meet its own costs of the application |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
there appears to the Tribunal, to be 8No. flats
- agent
Alba Management Services
- outcome
in this case, the application is refused.
- s20
The Tribunal does NOT grant dispensation from the requirements on the applicant to consult all leaseholders
- costs
The applicant will meet all of its costs arising from the making and determination of this application.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.