Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near SO14 3GQ

Ocean Village Marina Estates, Channel Way, Ocean Village, Southampton, Hampshire SO14 3GQ

CHI/00MS/LSC/2018/0058 · service charges · Southampton · decided 8 Mar 2019

The tribunal found that no section 20 consultation was needed before budget demands were issued, that the budgeted pontoon works costs were reasonable, and that the 2018/2019 financing contribution of £62,054 was not reasonably included in the budget, though this copy of the decision ends before the final outcome and section 20C order are given.

OutcomeNot stated
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not clear
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordMDL Developments Limited
Management companyOcean Village Marina Management Company limited
Managing agentMDL Developments Limited
BuildingAn estate
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputemajor works, other
Items disallowed or reducedother
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
1) MDL Developments Limited
management company
2) Ocean Village Marina Management
years
pursuant to budgets for the 17/18 and 18/19 service charge years
items reduced
the parties agreed that the financing contribution of £62,054 was not reasonably included within the 2018/2019 budget

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.