Oakdene Gardens, Fair Oak Road, Fair Oak, Hampshire SO50 7AL
HAV/24UD/LSC/2024/0639 · service charges · Eastleigh · decided 4 Sep 2025
The tribunal decided that the final cost of £223,456.24 for the drainage works was reasonable and payable through the service charge under the lease, and that no section 20 consultation was needed for the reserve fund professional fees.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | AEL Properties (Southern) Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 36 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2024, 2025 |
| Items in dispute | legal and professional fees, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £236,573.48 |
| Total found payable | £223,456.24 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
purpose-built residential block containing 36 flats
- freeholder
The freehold is held by AEL Properties (Southern) Limited
- agent
through their managing agents Centrick Limited
- years
spread over the years 2024 – 2025
- outcome
was reasonable and payable under the terms of the lease
- total demanded
as set out in the Statement of Case at £236,573.48
- total payable
The Tribunal determined that the final, actual cost of £223,456.24
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.