Oak Grange, Bradburns Lane, Northwich, Cheshire CW8 1TG
MAN/00EW/LDC/2025/0664 · dispensation from consultation · Cheshire West and Chester · decided 9 Mar 2026
The Tribunal granted unconditional dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for repairs to the flat roof membrane and lead flashings at Oak Grange, because no leaseholder showed any relevant prejudice from the lack of consultation.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | McCarthy & Stone Retirement Lifestyles Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 35 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising 35 self-contained residential apartments arranged over three storeys
- freeholder
The Applicant is the freeholder for the Property
- outcome
the Tribunal makes a determination to dispense with the requirement to consult with the Respondents on the works
- s20
makes a determination under section 20ZA of the Act to dispense with the requirement to consult with the Respondents under section 20
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.