Nos 16, 24 & 84 Oak Crescent Hinton Hereford HR2 6AJ
BIR/00GA/LDC/2024/0021 · dispensation from consultation · Herefordshire, County of · decided 13 Dec 2024
The tribunal granted the landlord Connexus Homes Limited dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for the energy efficiency and condensation works at Oak Crescent, as no leaseholder showed any prejudice.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Connexus Homes Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Michael Dyson Associates |
| Building | A block, 12 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Applicant is the freeholder of a block of 12 flats.
- freeholder
Applicant : Connexus Homes Limited
- agent
this has been assessed by [name] Associates (MDA), Connexus' Employer's Agent for the scheme
- outcome
The Tribunal therefore determines that the application is granted. The Applicant may dispense with the consultation requirements contained in section 20 of the Act in respect of the implementation of the works.
- s20
The Tribunal therefore determines that the application is granted.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.