Northumberland Court, Northumberland Avenue, Margate, Kent, CT9 3BS
CHI/29UN/LAM/2019/0008 · appointment of a manager · Thanet · decided 27 Aug 2019
No plain-English summary for this decision yet. See the original.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Northumberland Court (2008) Ltd |
| Management company | Northumberland Court Residents (Cliftonville) Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 42 flats · 3 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019, 2020 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, major works, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | insurance, administration charges |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The property comprises 42 flats and is sited on a corner plot
- freeholder
The freehold of the property is owned by Northumberland Court (2008) Limited (the Second Respondent)
- management company
The first Respondent, Northumberland Court Residents (Cliftonville) Limited (“The Residents’ Company”), holds a head lease
- outcome
In accordance with section 24(1) Landlord and Tenant Act 1987, Mr [name] MRICS of B2 Chartered Surveyors of 9/27 The Broadway, London N8 8DR is appointed as Manager
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.