North Lodge, Victoria Rise, London SW4 0NX
LON/00AY/LDC/2025/0660 · dispensation from consultation · Lambeth · decided 8 May 2025
The tribunal granted the RTM company dispensation from the s.20 consultation requirements for urgent repairs to a corroded downpipe causing leaks into a ground floor flat, as no prejudice to lessees was shown; the decision does not assess whether the works or their cost are reasonable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | North Lodge RTM Company Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Warwick Estates Property Management Ltd |
| Building | A block, 8 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £8,900.50 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a purpose built block of 8 flats
- freeholder
Applicant: North Lodge RTM Company Ltd
- agent
Ms [name] of Warwick Estates Property Management Ltd, the managing agents
- outcome
I am satisfied that it is reasonable to grant dispensation.
- total demanded
The quoted cost of the works was £8,900.50 plus VAT.
- s20
I am satisfied that it is reasonable to grant dispensation.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.