North Court and South Court, Concord Street, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS2 7QS
MAN/00DA/LSC/2022/0051 · service charges · Leeds · decided 20 Nov 2025
The tribunal granted dispensation from the consultation requirements for the 2021 waking watch and fire alarm costs, found the 2021/2022 service charges payable as set out in the schedule, and found the legal costs disputed by two respondents payable after they conceded the point.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Concord Street Management Company Limited |
| Management company | Concord Street Management Company Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021, 2022, 2023 |
| Items in dispute | legal and professional fees, other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | £202.36 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Concord Street Management Company
- years
the service charge years 2021/2022, 2022/2023 and 2023/2024
- outcome
the Tribunal likewise finds in favour of the Applicant in relation to these costs.
- total payable
Total: = £202.36 (per Respondent)
- s20
The Tribunal grants unconditional dispensation from the consultation requirements
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.