Norfolk House 1, 68 Norfolk Street, L1 0DB
MAN/00BY/LDC/2019/0003 · dispensation from consultation · Liverpool · decided 16 Apr 2019
The tribunal granted the landlords dispensation from the s.20 consultation requirements for urgent cladding replacement work at Norfolk House 1 and 2, required by a fire safety improvement notice, while leaving open whether the cost is recoverable through the service charge.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Baltic Property Management Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 156 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
developments of 156 studio apartments with commercial units on the ground floor (No 1) and 100 studio apartments (No 2)
- management company
Baltic Property Management Limited (Norfolk House 2)
- outcome
The Applicants are dispensed from complying with the consultation requirements in respect of the work specified in the applications.
- s20
We conclude it reasonable in accordance with Section 20ZA(1) of the Act to dispense with the consultation requirements
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.