Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near RM1 3EF

Nayland Court, Market Place, Romford, Essex RM1 3EF

· other · Havering · decided 16 Nov 2021

The tribunal granted the applicant management company dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for fire safety works estimated at £77,540.40 inclusive of VAT at Nayland Court.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 91 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demanded£77,540.40
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
This consists of 91 purpose built flats arranged in a four storey
outcome
The tribunal determines that dispensation should be given from all the consultation requirements in respect of fire safety works
total demanded
The estimated maximum cost of the proposed fire safety works is £77,540.40 inclusive of VAT.
s20
The tribunal determines that dispensation should be given from all the consultation requirements in respect of fire safety works

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.