Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near TN40 1HG

Mulberry Court, Devonshire Road, Bexhill-on-Sea, East Sussex TN40 1HG

CHI/21UG/LDC/2019/0056 · dispensation from consultation · Rother · decided 5 Sep 2019

The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation failures for the steel walkway, fire alarm and flat roof works, while stating it had not decided whether the costs are payable or reasonable.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentGodfrey John & Partners
BuildingA block
Service charge years in dispute2018
Items in disputemajor works
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

agent
Representative : [name]
years
The works were undertaken between February and April 2018.
outcome
The Tribunal therefore grants dispensation from any failures in
s20
The Tribunal therefore grants dispensation from any failures in the consultation process carried out in respect of replacing the steel walkway, provision of interlinked fire alarm and flat roof recovering

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.