Mount Pleasant, Hempton, Deddington, Oxfordshire OX15 0QS
CAM/38UB/LBC/2019/0007 · breach of lease · Cherwell · decided 9 Oct 2019
The Tribunal found that the lease is not a long lease, so it had no jurisdiction under section 168(4) of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2004 to make findings of breach of the repairing covenants, and it declined to grant declaratory relief.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- outcome
The Tribunal has no jurisdiction under section 168(4) of CLARA (“the Act”) to find the Respondent’s failure to comply with the repairing covenants in his lease
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.