Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near M15 4FY

Moho Building, Ellesmere Street, Manchester, M15 4FY

MAN/00BN/LSC/2020/0053 · service charges · Manchester · decided 5 Oct 2020

The tribunal decided that the cost of the fire alarm system (Option B, tendered by Barlows UK Ltd) may be included in the service charge, rejecting the leaseholder's argument that it was not a permitted maintenance charge under the lease.

OutcomePayable as demanded
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordUrban Splash Limited
Management companyMoho Management Company Limited
Managing agentMainstay Group Limited
BuildingA block
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputeother
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
to indemnify the Landlord Urban Splash Limited against any consequential loss or expense
management company
Applicant : [name] Management Company Limited
agent
The Applicant employs Mainstay Group Limited as its agents to manage the [name].
outcome
The service charge payable by the Respondents (in their respective proportions) shall include the Tender Sum Option B specified in the tender of Barlows UK Ltd

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.