Moat Court, 42 Branksome Wood Road, Bournemouth, BH4 9LA
CHI/00HN/LIS/2022/0035 · LIS · Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole · decided 22 May 2023
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the on-account service charge for 2022/23 for major works, including a 15 per cent administration fee, reasonable and payable, and made an order under section 20C so the landlord cannot add the costs of these proceedings to the service charge.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Synergy Housing Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 16 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2022 |
| Items in dispute | major works, management fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
There are 16 residential flats within the property.
- freeholder
The Applicant is the freeholder of Moat Court
- years
year 2022/23 of £300,000 plus VAT of £60,000.00
- outcome
was reasonable and payable
- s20c
to make an Order under section 20C of the 1985 Act preventing
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.