Millennium House, 7 High Street, Hampton, TW12 2SA
LON/00BD/LDC/2025/0785 · dispensation from consultation · Richmond upon Thames · decided 21 Oct 2025
The tribunal granted the landlord retrospective and urgent dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for roof and redecoration works at Millennium House, without conditions.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Millennium House Freehold Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 5 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
There are five flats, three with three bedrooms and two with two.
- freeholder
Applicant : Millennium House Freehold Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal grants these applications to dispense with the consultation requirements imposed by section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 without condition.
- s20
The Tribunal grants these applications to dispense with the consultation requirements imposed by section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 without condition.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.