Mildenhall, 25-27 West Cliff Road, Bournemouth, Dorset, BH4 8AX/Y
CHI/00HN/LDC/2022/0035 · dispensation from consultation · Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole · decided 10 Aug 2022
The tribunal granted the landlord unconditional dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent water pump and supply works, while leaving leaseholders free to challenge the reasonableness and payability of the costs under section 27A.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Mildenhall RTE Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 59 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
with the total number of units being 59
- management company
the Applicant, [name] RTE Limited (“The Applicants”)
- outcome
the Applicants are given unconditional dispensation from the consultation requirements under s 20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
the Applicants are given unconditional dispensation from the consultation requirements under s 20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.