Micklegate House, Horsefair, Pontefract and Unit 3 The Walkway, Shop Kiosk Unit 6 The Walkway, 4, 6, 6B and 10A Horsefair WF8 1PD
MAN/00DB/LDC/2023/0023 · dispensation from consultation · Wakefield · decided 4 Aug 2023
The Tribunal dispensed with the s.20 consultation requirements for the urgent replacement of the water pump serving Micklegate House and the adjoining units in Horsefair, Pontefract, finding it reasonable to proceed without full consultation.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Brigante Properties Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 28 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Premises is three stories in height and comprises 28 residential flats and ground floor commercial units.
- freeholder
The Applicant, Brigante Properties Ltd., is the freehold owner and landlord of
- outcome
is dispensed with in relation to the replacement of the water pump which serves the Premises.
- s20
is dispensed with in relation to the replacement of the water pump which serves the Premises.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.