Meridian Point Friars Road Coventry CV1 2LB

BIR/00CQ/LSC/2023/0016 · service charges · Coventry · decided 28 May 2024

figures not yet checked

The tribunal found the 2023 budget of £27,000 and most of the 2024 budgets payable, reduced the 2024 budget by £30,542.40, and made a partial section 20C order so that 25% of the landlord's costs cannot be charged to the service charge.

Outcome	Reduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Order made
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Leaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlord	Marden Ltd
Management company	none named
Managing agent	none named
Building	A block, 31 flats
Service charge years in dispute	2023, 2024
Items in dispute	legal and professional fees, other
Items disallowed or reduced	none stated
Total demanded	not stated as one figure
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	none stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n: Meridian Point is a seven storey building in Coventry with 31 residential flats
freeholder: Respondent : Marden Ltd
years: in the 2023 and 2024 service charge budgets for the Property
outcome: We therefore determine that the budget for 2024 should be reduced overall by the sum of £30,542.40.
s20c: We determine that we will make a section 20C order to the effect that twenty five per cent (25%) of the Respondents costs of these proceedings

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.