Medlock Place, 30 City Road East, Manchester M15 4TD
MAN/00BN/LDC/2024/0001 · dispensation from consultation · Manchester · decided 23 Jul 2025
The tribunal granted dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for replacing the water pumps at Medlock Place, on condition that the landlord's agent repays £628 into the building reserve fund, and the landlord cannot recover its application costs from leaseholders.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Samnas Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Residential Management Group |
| Building | A block, 22 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2022 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant may not recover its costs of this application from the respondents; the applicant to repay £628 (administr |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Applicant is the owner of Medlock Place, an 8 storey block of 22 residential flats in Manchester.
- agent
The managing agents in 2022 were Residential Management Group (“RMG”)
- years
The managing agents in 2022 were Residential Management Group
- outcome
1. Subject to compliance with paragraph 3 below, the consultation requirements contained at section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 are dispensed with
- s20
the consultation requirements contained at section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 are dispensed with in relation to the replacement of water pumps
- costs
The Applicant’s costs of this application may not be recovered from the Respondents via the service charge provisions of their leases or otherwise.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.