McNeil House, Charlotte Avenue, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 6DW
CHI/45UD/LDC/2024/0005 · dispensation from consultation · Chichester · decided 16 Apr 2024
The tribunal retrospectively dispensed with the statutory consultation requirements for urgent emergency roof repairs at McNeil House, because the works were necessary and no prejudice to leaseholders was shown; the reasonableness of the costs was not decided.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Roussillon Park Management Company |
| Management company | Roussillon Park Management Company Ltd |
| Managing agent | Residential Management Group Ltd |
| Building | A block, 6 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
residential block comprising six flats over three storeys
- freeholder
Applicant : Roussillon Park Management Company
- agent
Representative : Residential Management Group Ltd
- outcome
The Tribunal grants an order retrospectively dispensing with
- s20
The Tribunal grants an order retrospectively dispensing with
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.