Maygood House, Maygood Street, London N1 9QR
LON/00AM/LSC/2020/0072 · service charges · Islington · decided 2 Sep 2020
The tribunal found that the landlord is responsible for repairing the flat windows including the glass, found the 2018 and 2019 service charges payable and reasonable, and made a section 20C order after the landlord abandoned the window replacement scheme.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | R Trading Company 1 Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 30 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2018, 2019, 2020 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, major works, management fees, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
is a 1930s purpose-built block of 30 flats on 5 floors
- freeholder
Landlord : R Trading Company 1 Ltd
- years
The issues relate to the 2018, 2019 and 2020 service charge years.
- outcome
determines that each of the charges which were the subject of challenge were payable and reasonable
- s20c
The Tribunal makes an Order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.