Martello Lofts, 315 Portland Road, Hove, BN2 5SE
HAV/00ML/LDC/2025/0714 · dispensation from consultation · Brighton and Hove · decided 5 Nov 2025
The tribunal granted retrospective and prospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for fire stopping works in communal areas and fire-resistant work to the balconies at Martello Lofts, without conditions, though it made no decision on whether the costs are payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | RC Developments (Martello) Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 8 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works, other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
converted into twenty eight residential units
- freeholder
Applicant : [name] (Martello) Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the application for the dispensation of all or any of the consultation requirements provided for by section 20
- s20
The Tribunal grants the application for the dispensation of all or any of the consultation requirements provided for by section 20
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.