Marsham Court, Marsham Street, London SW1P 4LA
LON/00BK/LDC/2025/0881 · dispensation from consultation · Westminster · decided 16 Apr 2026
The tribunal allowed the landlord's application to dispense retrospectively with the Section 20 consultation requirements for urgent asbestos removal or encapsulation works in the boiler room, while leaseholders keep their right to challenge the reasonableness and payability of the costs.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Haus Block Management |
| Building | A block, 154 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Building is a multi-storey purpose block built consisting of 154 flats and one commercial unit.
- agent
Representative : Haus Block Management
- outcome
The Tribunal determines to allow this application to dispense retrospectively with the consultation requirements imposed by Section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
the consultation requirements are retrospectively dispensed in respect of the necessary works identified in the AsMatt report
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.