Marsh House & Telephone Apartments, Marsh Street, Bristol, BS1 4AQ
CHI/00HB/LDC/2022/0066 · dispensation from consultation · Bristol, City of · decided 23 Dec 2022
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal refused the landlord's application to dispense with consultation for the additional fire-coating and decking works, so the landlord can recover no more than £250 from leaseholders towards those costs, and it barred the landlord from recovering its costs of the proceedings.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Aviva Investors Ground Rent Holdco Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Mainstay Residential |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021 |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £42,155.48 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant may not recover the costs of the proceedings from the respondents |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- agent
Mr [name] of Mainstay Residential appeared in person for the Applicant
- years
the additional works were carried out in the period between 27 October 2021 to 19 November 2021
- outcome
The Tribunal, therefore, refuses the Application for dispensation of
- total demanded
the actual costs of the works in total were £42,155.48 inclusive of VAT
- s20c
makes an Order preventing the Applicant from recovering the costs of the proceedings from the Respondents
- s20
relevant prejudice from the Applicant’s failure to consult
- costs
makes an Order preventing the Applicant from recovering the costs of the proceedings from the Respondents
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.