Marnock House, Kingswood Road, Tunbridge Wells, Kent, TN2 4XP
CHI/29UQ/LDC/2022/0075 · dispensation from consultation · Tunbridge Wells · decided 1 Nov 2022
The Tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent works to the smoke vent system needed for fire safety, without deciding whether the resulting costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Aultmore (Tunbridge Wells) Management Company limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 24 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
the Applicant describes the property as a purpose built block of 24 flats
- management company
Applicant : [name] (Tunbridge Wells) Management Company limited
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of s.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of s.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of works required to the smoke vent system
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.