Marloes, Park Road, Altrincham WA14 3JF
MAN/00BU/LDC/2023/0035 · dispensation from consultation · Trafford · decided 2 Nov 2023
The tribunal granted the applicant management company dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent roof repairs carried out at the property in March and April 2023, with no prejudice to leaseholders found.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Marloes Management Company Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 8 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a puropose built development comprising eight flats
- outcome
The application to dispense with the consultation requirements imposed by Section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The application to dispense with the consultation requirements imposed by Section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (“the Act”) and The Service Charges (Consultation Requirements) (England) Regulations 2003 in respect of works carried out at the Property in the sum of £14520 is granted.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.