Mapesbury Court, 59-61 Shoot-Up Hill, London, NW2 3PU
LON/00AE/LDC/2024/0248 · dispensation from consultation · Brent · decided 12 Mar 2025
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for asbestos removal, boiler replacement and related access works at Mapesbury Court, because the asbestos and the failed boilers made the works necessary and the leaseholders would suffer no prejudice.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Transgain Ltd. |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 40 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The first block contains flats 1 to 20 and the second flats 21 to 40.
- freeholder
Applicant : Transgain Ltd.
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the statutory consultation requirements shall be dispensed with in respect of the following works
- s20
I am satisfied that the consultation requirements should be dispensed with.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.