Lyttel Hall, Coopers Hill Road, South Nutfield, Surrey, RH1 4HZ
HAV/43UK/LDC/2026/0105 · dispensation from consultation · Tandridge · decided 26 Aug 2026
The tribunal granted the landlord Lyttel Hall Freehold Limited dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent roof works to a flat roof, without conditions, while leaseholders keep their right to challenge the cost under section 27A.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Lyttel Hall Freehold Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 10 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
converted in 2008
- freeholder
Applicant : Lyttel Hall Freehold Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the application for the dispensation of all or any of the consultation requirements provided for by section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The Tribunal unconditionally grants the Applicant’s application for the dispensation of all or any of the consultation requirements
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.