Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near RH4 2JX

Lyndon Court, 49-55 South Street, Dorking, Surrey, RH4 2JX

HAV/43UE/LDC/2025/0609 · dispensation from consultation · Mole Valley · decided 2 Jun 2025

The tribunal granted retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent roof repairs to stop water ingress at Lyndon Court, but made no decision on whether the costs are reasonable or payable.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 5 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
Five flats (lobbied approach on upper floors)
outcome
The Applicant is granted retrospective dispensation under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
s20
The Tribunal consequently finds that it is reasonable to dispense with all of the formal consultation requirements in respect of the major works to the building as described in this Decision.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.