Lower Minnickfold Place, Anstie Lane, Dorking, Surrey RH5 4LS
CHI/43UE/LBC/2023/0024 · breach of lease · Mole Valley · decided 4 Jul 2024
The tribunal found the Respondents breached their lease by not sweeping all four chimneys annually and by not decorating the eastern elevation, but held that the landlord had waived those breaches by demanding insurance rent after the application was issued.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 2 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, major works, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
This building consists of two flats.
- outcome
We find that the Respondents have breached clause 2(4) in not decorating the whole of the exterior in accordance with that clause of the lease.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.