Lower Minnickfold Place, Anstie Lane, Dorking, Surrey RH5 4LP
HAV/43UE/LBC/2025/0618 · breach of lease · Mole Valley · decided 1 Sep 2026
figures not yet checkedThe Tribunal found none of the alleged breaches of the lease by the leaseholders were made out, so the landlord's application under section 168(4) failed and the landlord's costs of the application cannot be recovered through the service charge.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2025 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, major works, repairs and maintenance, cleaning and grounds, reserve fund, utilities, administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- outcome
the Tribunal determines that for the purposes of section 168(4) of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 none of the alleged breaches of covenant are made out.
- s20c
the Tribunal makes an Order under s20(C) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and paragraph 5A of Schedule 11 to the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 that any costs relating to this application may not be recovered through the service charge or as an administration charge.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.