Lower Ground Floor Flat, 8 Walters Road, London, SE25 6LF
LON/00AH/LBC/2022/0073 · breach of lease · Croydon · decided 28 Sep 2023
The tribunal refused the landlord's application for costs against the leaseholders under Rule 13 and ruled that the landlord's contractual costs were not payable under paragraph 5A of Schedule 11, as the tribunal found the substantive application misguided.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Primeview Developments Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant's Rule 13 application for costs dismissed; no costs awarded against the respondent |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : Primeview Developments Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that as regards the Rule 13 application the applicant has not produced any evidence to support an assertion that the respondent had acted unreasonably in the conduct of the case. The claim is dismissed.
- costs
The Tribunal determines that costs will not be awarded against the Respondent under Rule 13(1)(b)
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.